Conflict of Laws / Private International Law

Brick Court Chambers offers pre-eminent expertise in Private International Law. Its members have appeared in many of the leading cases in the ECJ, the English courts and in offshore jurisdictions.

Chambers offers outstanding expertise in the rules of jurisdiction. Members of Chambers routinely deal with the jurisdiction rules of the Brussels I Regulation, applications for service out of the jurisdiction and forum non conveniens challenges, as well as advising on service of process overseas and obtaining evidence abroad. Freezing injunctions and anti-suit injunctions are central to the practice of Chambers; as is the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.

Members of Chambers have also appeared in leading cases on all aspects of choice of law. Chambers is also able to offer extensive expertise in the ever increasing number of new Regulations and Conventions in this field: notably in relation to the new "Rome I" Regulation on choice of law in contract and the new "Rome II" Regulation on choice of law for non-contractual obligations, both of which came into force in 2009.

Chambers can also offer extensive expertise in Private International Law litigation in overseas jurisdictions. Its members routinely appear in leading Private International Law litigation in offshore jurisdictions around the world, including the Bahamas, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands and Jersey. Members of Chambers also regularly offer expert opinions on aspects of English Private International Law in foreign proceedings.

What the Directories say ...

"At Brick Court, instructing solicitors know they are dealing with "a chambers with no shortage of talent or work." Said to be "consistently impressive," the set is "a first choice for truly heavyweight cases," thanks to the "exceptional range of expertise and skill" on offer both at silk and junior level." (Chambers & Partners 2012)

'Solicitors and clients admire the "constant accessibility and top quality" of the impressive barristers at this set, which is regularly involved in a good number of the most high-profile cases. An obvious choice for the weightiest litigation, it has contributed barristers to both the litigation surrounding the 2005 explosion at the Buncefield oil refinery in Hertfordshire, and the £750 million fight between Sky and EDS over a tender for software systems. All the tenants here are of a fine quality' (Chambers & Partners 2009)

Barristers Practising in this Area