Brick Court Chambers

News & Events

‘One of the super-sets’, Brick Court Chambers is ‘an all-round strong’ set with ‘a large selection of high-quality competition law specialists’, ‘top commercial counsel’, ‘an excellent chambers for banking litigation’, and a ‘go-to’ set for public administrative law.
The Legal 500 2020
The clerks’ room ‘sets the benchmark’ for other sets with its ‘friendly, knowledgeable, and hardworking’ clerks.
The Legal 500 2020
"An outstanding commercial set with a track record of excellence across its core areas of work."
Chambers & Partners 2018
"A set that is singled out for its "first-rate" clerking and "client service-oriented, commercial approach."

Scope for representative proceedings for misuse of private information

22/05/23

Prismall v. Google UK Ltd. & DeepMind Technologies Ltd. [2023] EWHC 1169 (KB)

Large-scale storage of personal data might be thought to lead to large-scale distributions of damages if such data is misused. The Supreme Court’s judgment in Lloyd v. Google [2022] AC 1217 largely extinguished hopes of the emergence of class actions for data breaches without legislative intervention. However, that judgment appeared to leave open the possibility of a class of the victims of a data breach recovering in representative proceedings under CPR 19.8 for the tort of misuse of private information via a claim for damages for loss of control. If each had lost some control in a generic way recognised by the law, their damages might be quantified in representative proceedings on the basis of the lowest common denominator across the represented class, thus avoiding any need for individualised assessment of damages. The first case to explore that possibility has been dismissed by a judgment of Heather Williams J, holding that on the facts the lowest common denominator was insubstantial, but the possibility remains for an appropriate future case.

The judgment is here.

Gerard Rothschild appeared for the Representative Claimant (instructed by Mishcon de Reya).