Brick Court Chambers

News & Events

‘One of the super-sets’, Brick Court Chambers is ‘an all-round strong’ set with ‘a large selection of high-quality competition law specialists’, ‘top commercial counsel’, ‘an excellent chambers for banking litigation’, and a ‘go-to’ set for public administrative law.
The Legal 500 2020
The clerks’ room ‘sets the benchmark’ for other sets with its ‘friendly, knowledgeable, and hardworking’ clerks.
The Legal 500 2020
"An outstanding commercial set with a track record of excellence across its core areas of work."
Chambers & Partners 2018
"A set that is singled out for its "first-rate" clerking and "client service-oriented, commercial approach."

Aluminium salt producers successfully appeal request for animal testing


The Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency has allowed an appeal by producers of aluminium salts against decisions requiring them to carry out animal testing.

In a conjoined appeal, registrants of aluminium sulphate, aluminium chloride and aluminium chloride basic challenged three decisions taken by ECHA under the substance evaluation provisions of the REACH Regulation. WR Grace, a leading US-based chemicals corporation with a substantial EU presence, intervened in the appeal, arguing that the additional in vivo tests requested by ECHA were unnecessary in circumstances where existing scientific data on chemically similar substances could be ‘read across’ to the three salts in question.

Following a contested oral hearing in Helsinki, the Board of Appeal allowed the appeal in full and annulled the requests for additional testing. In particular, the Board upheld the arguments of WR Grace in their entirety, finding that the proposed ‘read-across’ from existing scientific data had been wrongly rejected by ECHA; and that the published data on similar substances, properly interpreted, supported the conclusion that ECHA had failed to demonstrate a sufficient risk to justify further testing. The Board’s decision provides important clarification on the circumstances in which it will be appropriate to read across data from one substance to another.

The Board of Appeal’s decision is available here.

David Scannell and Andrew McIntyre represented the Intervener, WR Grace. Andrew McIntyre appeared for WR Grace at the Board of Appeal hearing in Helsinki.