Practice Areas

Public Law

  • “Brick Court Chambers continues to command considerable respect for its administrative and public law practice with an emphasis on commercial and regulatory matters.”

    - Chambers & Partners 2014

  • “Brick Court Chambers is the standout commercial public law set, and regularly advises and acts for international commercial entities in complex public law proceedings.”

    - Chambers & Partners 2013

  • “Brick Court remains committed to administrative and public law and is the place to go if you require the most commercially focused public lawyers available.”

    - Chambers & Partners 2012

  • “Brick Court Chambers fields ‘many talented specialists in public law’ and ‘truly excellent’ clerks.”

    - Legal 500 2011

» See all quotes


Our barristers act over the whole range of public law practice areas in courts and tribunals in the United Kingdom and Ireland, the European courts in Luxembourg and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. We also appear in a range of other common law jurisdictions in Asia, Africa, the Caribbean and the UK’s overseas territories. We are experts in the law governing the relationship between persons (natural and legal) and the state. For claimants, we are equally at home representing commercial clients challenging complex regulatory or governmental decisions as acting for individuals or NGOs in ground-breaking human rights and constitutional challenges. We also act for regulator and other public body defendants and many of our QCs and juniors appear regularly in high-profile litigation for the Crown. In the commercial sphere, our work spans subject areas as diverse as aviation, banking, broadcasting & media, energy, financial services, healthcare, pensions, pharmaceuticals, tax, telecoms and transport. More generally, our members have acted in some of the leading cases in education, environmental law, equality & discrimination, local authority powers, national security law and sanctions.

Expertise within Public Law includes:

  • Constitutional Law
  • Data protection and freedom of information
  • Environmental Law
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration & Nationality
  • Judicial Review
  • Media & Broadcasting
  • Medical & Pharmaceutical Regulation
  • Public Inquiries
  • Public International Law
  • Public Procurement
  • Regulatory & Disciplinary Law
  • Transport Law

Notable Cases

Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom

Animal Defenders International challenged the UK’s blanket ban on political advertising on TV and radio as incompatible with the right to freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 ECHR. In a judgment which effectively overrules its own previous case law, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights upheld the ban by a majority of 9-8 as a proportionate means of preventing the UK political process from becoming skewed towards the interests of those with the deepest pockets.

Kadi v Council & Commission

Mr Kadi was included in the United Nations Security Council’s terrorist asset freezing sanctions just after 9/11, without giving him any reasons.  His challenges in Luxembourg to the European Union’s implementation of those restrictive measures are the leading cases on the relationship between international law and European law, on due process and rights of defence in the European Union, and on judicial review of targeted economic sanctions.

Chagos Islanders v United Kingdom

The Chagossians were evicted from the British Indian Ocean Territories in the early 1970s, to make way for a naval base on Diego Garcia.  The cases they have brought are of constitutional importance.  Bancoult I established that the power to govern for “peace, order and good governance” did not empower the UK to expel the islanders.  Bancoult 2 is the leading judgment on the reviewability of the royal prerogative, and their case in Strasbourg on the extra-territoriality of the ECHR.  The ongoing judicial review of the fishing ban will decide on the UK’s EU obligations to overseas territories, and the admissibility of Wikileaks cables.

Ubamaka Edward Wilson v Secretary of State for Security and Director of Immigration

Ubamaka is a landmark case in the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong. The Appellant successfully argued that Hong Kong has an obligation to offer protection to those facing the threat of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (‘CIHDT’). The highly significant judgment states that those who fear either torture or CIHDT should in fact be afforded protection.

Olympic Stadium Judicial Review

The high-profile judicial review challenge involving Tottenham Hotspurs’ right to use the Olympic Stadium saw football teams competing in the courts. The result was a goalless draw with West Ham having the rug pulled from under them when Newham did not proceed to fund. This is one of a number or cases which show the growing importance of, and high stakes in, cases involving procurement.


About cookies on our website

Following a revised EU directive on website cookies, each company based, or doing business, in the EU is required to notify users about the cookies used on their website.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience of certain areas of the site and to allow the use of specific functionality like social media page sharing. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but as a result parts of the site may not work as intended.

To find out more about what cookies are, which cookies we use on this website and how to delete and block cookies, please see our Which cookies we use page.

Click on the button below to accept the use of cookies on this website (this will prevent the dialogue box from appearing on future visits)