Husband in big money divorce did not make a “special contribution” to family welfare

13/04/17, Public Law

Work v Gray [2017] EWCA Civ 270

The Court of Appeal has rejected the appeal by Randy Work that he made a “special financial contribution” to the welfare of his family by making an exceptionally large sum of money, such that an unequal division of wealth in his favour in his divorce settlement should be awarded.  The Court of Appeal rejected the argument that the concept of “special contribution” to family welfare under section 25(2)(f) of the Matrimonial Causes Act is inherently discriminatory in that it is likely to favour men and breadwinners in divorce proceedings (noting that it is extremely rarely applied), but held that a special contribution had not been made out in this case.

A link to the judgment is here.

Maya Lester QC and Oliver Jones appeared for Mandy Gray, instructed by Payne Hicks Beach.

« Back to news listings

About cookies on our website

Following a revised EU directive on website cookies, each company based, or doing business, in the EU is required to notify users about the cookies used on their website.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience of certain areas of the site and to allow the use of specific functionality like social media page sharing. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but as a result parts of the site may not work as intended.

To find out more about what cookies are, which cookies we use on this website and how to delete and block cookies, please see our Which cookies we use page.

Click on the button below to accept the use of cookies on this website (this will prevent the dialogue box from appearing on future visits)