Andrew Thomas

Year of Call: 1996

Clerk: Tony Burgess

Andrew Thomas

Year of Call: 1996

Clerk: Tony Burgess


“Andrew Thomas, who is ‘extremely thorough in his analysis and thinking’, and ‘tactically shrewd in his submissions, particularly in court’”
- The Legal 500 2013


Andrew Thomas has advised on and appeared, both led and un-led, in a wide spectrum of commercial litigation and arbitrations including banking, aviation, telecoms, professional negligence, shipping, insurance and reinsurance, and jurisdictional related disputes. In addition to regularly appearing in the Commercial Court and before other tribunals in England, he has participated in hearings in Zurich and the British Virgin Islands.

Andrew began his career by acting as Junior Counsel in the BSE Inquiry conducted by Lord Phillips and has since been involved in a number of disputes involving over £100 million including Bancomext v ETECSA. Andrew has acted for a Prince and Princess of Romania, Sir Allen Stanford, the London Philharmonic Orchestra and The Harlequins Football Club. Andrew has also pursued claims against Mr Nicholas Van Hoogstraten and several major banks including Credit Suisse, UBS and Calyon.

Andrew has experience with issues ranging from abstract points in construction of commercial contracts and acted in Durham Tees Valley Airport v bmibaby [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 68 and Camerata v Credit Suisse [2011] 2 B.C.L.C. 54. He also has extensive experience involving complex jurisdiction disputes. He recently acted in UBS v Regione Calabria [2012] 1 C.L.C. 580.

Andrew is ranked as a Leading Junior in Banking and Finance by the Legal 500 2012.

practice areas


Commercial litigation and arbitrations

Andrew has extensive experience of complex substantive commercial disputes involving contractual issues and torts, in a wide variety of contexts (including various cases with international dimensions giving rise to issues as to jurisdiction and the applicable law).

  • Durham Tees Valley Airport v bmibaby [2011] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 731; [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 68 - Court of Appeal, regarding measure of damages
  • Durham Tees Valley Airport Ltd v bmibaby Ltd [2009] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 1083; [2009] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 246 - construction of contract
  • Reliance Globalcom Ltd v OTE International Solutions SA [2011] EWHC 1848 (QB)
  • FR Lurssen Werft GmbH & Co KG v Halle [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 265
  • FR Lurssen Werft GmbH & Co KG v Halle [2010] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 20
  • Bancomext v ETECSA [2007] 2 C.L.C. 690 [2007] I.L.Pr. 59
  • Bancomext v ETECSA [2007] EWCA Civ 662; [2008] 1 W.L.R. 1936; [2008] Bus. L.R. 1265; [2007] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 1093; [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 484 - Court of Appeal
  • Metal Distributors (UK) Ltd -v- ZCCM Investment Holdings Plc [2005] 2 Lloyd's Rep 37 regarding the jurisdiction of arbitrators.
  • Anglo Eastern Trust -v- Kermanshahchi [2003] BPIR 1229m, a commercial dispute involving property transactions.
  • Represented Sir Allen Stanford in relation to a sponsorship dispute over the Stanford 20/20 for 20 cricket series (with Mark Cran QC).
  • Junior Counsel on a telecommunications arbitration involving allegations of money laundering and claims for assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
  • Engaged in proceedings involving damage to oil pipelines, giving rise to various issues of quantification of alleged future losses.

Banking and finance

Andrew is ranked as a Leading Junior in Banking and Finance by the Legal 500 2013.

Andrew has been engaged on various cases involving major banks (including Credit Suisse, UBS, Calyon, Lehman Brothers, Barings, NatWest, HSBC and Lloyds) which raised issues regarding:

  • the duties owed by banks to its customers;
  • the duties owed to banks by their auditors;
  • construction of mandates given to banks,
  • liabilities under guarantees to banks;
  • rights and obligations of various banks and other parties under letters of credit;
  • duties of banks under custodian agreements;
  • various demands for banking records;
  • the misselling of financial services products.

His notable banking and finance cases include:

  • Camerata v Credit Suisse [2012] EWHC 7 (Comm) [2011] EWHC 479 (Comm); [2011] 2 B.C.L.C. 54; [2011] 1 C.L.C. 627
  • Camerata v Credit Suisse [2012] EWHC 7 (Comm); [2012] 1 C.L.C. 234; [2012] P.N.L.R. 15 [insert check]
  • UBS v Regione Calabria [2012] EWHC 699 (Comm); [2012] 1 C.L.C. 580; [2012] I.L.Pr. 22
  • Calyon v PZL - [2009] EWHC 1914 (Comm); [2009] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 603
  • Junior counsel for Coopers & Lybrand in the Barings Litigation, involving allegations of negligence by the auditors of Barings in relation to the activities of Nick Leeson.

Civil Fraud

Extensive practical experience in litigation involving allegations of civil fraud and deceit, including related interim relief hearings (particularly freezing orders) and asset recovery issues.

  • Bampton v Rust [2008] EWHC 3662 (QB) - Accountancy professional negligence and deceit
  • Brampton v Rust [2008] EWHC 216 (QB)
  • Cadogan Petroleum Plc v Tolley [2009] EWHC 2527 (Ch) - conspiracy
  • Engaged in proceedings by Motorola Credit Corporation against Uzan and others, including issues regarding whole wide freezing orders.
  • Various cases requiring urgent applications for freezing orders, including on behalf of the London Philharmonic Orchestra

Other notable cases

  • Waltham Forest LBC v Oakmesh Ltd [2009] EWHC 1688 (Ch); [2010] J.P.L. 249
  • Transco Plc v United Utilities Water Plc [2005] EWHC 2784 (QB);
  • Metal Distributors (UK) Ltd v ZCCM Investment Holdings Plc [2005] EWHC 156 (Comm); [2005] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 37; Times, March 9, 2005
  • Engaged in long-running litigation against Mr Van Hoogstraten by the estate of Mr Raja, including matters relating to freezing orders and Raja -v- Van Hoogstraten (Court of Appeal) with regard to contempt and abuse of process. Includes Raja v Van Hoogstraten [2004] EWCA Civ 968; [2004] 4 All E.R. 793.
  • Anglo Eastern Trust Ltd v Kermanshahchi [2003] EWHC 1939 (Ch); [2003] B.P.I.R. 1229 - hearing regarding beneficial interests in property and alleged transactions at an undervalue
  • Carnoustie Universal SA v International Transport Workers Federation [2002] EWHC 1624 (Comm); [2002] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 657;
  • Don King Productions Inc -v- Warren and Others [1998] 2 All ER 608, [1999] 3 WLR 276, [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep 176, [1998] 2 BCLC 132, [1998] RPC 817 regarding contractual assignments and declarations of trust.
  • Carnoustie Universal SA and others -v- International Transport Workers' Federation and others [2002] 2 All ER (Comm) 657, involving issues of conflicts of laws, jurisdiction and duress.
  • J Sainsbury plc -v- Broadway Malyan (a firm) (Ernest Green Partnership Ltd, third party) 61 Con LR 31 - including issues regarding loss of a chance and contribution claims.
  • Junior Counsel in the BSE Inquiry conducted by Lord Phillips

Qualifications & Further Information


Andrew regularly gives seminars to solicitors and clients in house on a range of subjects including on repudiatory breaches of contract.

Qualifications and prizes

Law B.A. (First Class Honours), Balliol College, Oxford

Recipient of Oxford University's Eldon Law Scholarship, and the Slaughter and May prize for the Best Performance in Contract in Finals, and Inner Temple's Princess Royal Scholarship.

Further Information

Called to the Inner Temple

Other interests - Science fiction and the exploration of space.

Called to the Bar of the British Virgin Islands

Directory Quotes

Andrew is ranked as a Leading Junior in Commercial Litigation, and Banking and Finance by the Legal 500 2014.

  • "He has a good eye for detail and cuts through to the central issues." (The Legal 500 2016)
  • "He formulates arguments that please the court and clients." (The Legal 500 2016)
  • "Extremely bright, and good at spotting the merits of a case." (The Legal 500 2014)
  • "A very good junior, who is superb with difficult clients and challenging cases." (The Legal 500 2014)
  • "Andrew Thomas, who is ‘extremely thorough in his analysis and thinking', and ‘tactically shrewd in his submissions, particularly in court'" (Legal 500 2013)

About cookies on our website

Following a revised EU directive on website cookies, each company based, or doing business, in the EU is required to notify users about the cookies used on their website.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience of certain areas of the site and to allow the use of specific functionality like social media page sharing. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but as a result parts of the site may not work as intended.

To find out more about what cookies are, which cookies we use on this website and how to delete and block cookies, please see our Which cookies we use page.

Click on the button below to accept the use of cookies on this website (this will prevent the dialogue box from appearing on future visits)