"She's got a terrific brain and is good under siege."
- Chambers & Partners 2017
"Insightful and authoritative; an outstanding barrister."
- Legal 500 2016
Kelyn Bacon QC specialises in competition and EU law, with particular expertise in State aid law and pharmaceutical regulation. She has appeared in numerous landmark cases in the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, as well as the Competition Appeal Tribunal and proceedings before the Competition Commission and European Commission, and she has acted in over 50 cases in the European Courts. Her clients have included major domestic and international private clients such as HSBC, Microsoft, Intel, Adidas, Visa, BUPA, Pfizer, Teva, Aer Lingus, Telefónica and the BBC, as well as government departments and the CMA.
Kelyn is cited in Chambers and Partners as a leading practitioner in Competition/EU law, Telecommunications and Intellectual Property. She is also the general editor and co-author of the leading practitioner textbook European Union Law of State Aid (3rd edition 2017).
Kelyn is currently instructed in numerous competition and EU law disputes in the Competition Appeal Tribunal, High Court and Court of Appeal, and is acting in various proceedings in the European Courts raising issues of competition law, State aid and pharmaceutical regulation. She is also acting as a State aid expert in 6 BIT/ECT arbitrations.
Kelyn practises predominantly in the fields of EU/Competition and Public Law, including State aid law and pharmaceutical regulation.
Kelyn has extensive experience in the fields of competition and State aid law, both advising clients and appearing in domestic courts and tribunals, as well as proceedings before the Competition Commission, the European Commission and the European Courts. Her areas of expertise include Article 101/Chapter I prohibition, Article 102/Chapter II prohibition and competition damages actions. Her clients have included major domestic and international private clients, as well as the OFT/CMA. She appeared as the Advocate to the Supreme Court in the SeaFrance merger case, and is currently instructed in one of the Euribor appeals in the European Court, as well as the Phenytoin appeals in the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
Important European Court cases include: Case T-105/17 HSBC v Commission, C-286/11 P Commission v Tomkins, T-201/04 Microsoft v Commission, T-328/03 O2 v Commission, T-210/01 General Electric v Commission.
Important domestic cases include: Flynn v CMA (CAT), Société Coopérative de Production SeaFrance (Supreme Court), Emerald v BA and others (High Court), AXA v CMA (CAT), HCA v CMA (CAT), Skyscanner v CMA (CAT), Teva v Reckitt Benckiser (High Court), Secretary of State for Health and others v Servier (High Court and CA), Construction bid-rigging cases (CAT and CA), Ryanair v OFT and Aer Lingus (CAT and CA), National Grid v ABB and others (High Court), Barclays v Competition Commission (CAT), H3G v O2 and others (High Court), Mastercard v OFT (CAT), Adidas v Draper (High Court), Umbro v OFT (CAT), IBA v OFT (CAT and CA).
State aid law
Kelyn is recognised as one of the bar’s leading State aid practitioners, and she has acted in some of the leading domestic and EU State aid cases, as well as advising both private sector and public sector clients, including various government departments and local government bodies. She is the general editor and co-author of the leading practitioner textbook European Union Law of State Aid (3rd edition 2017).
Important European Court cases include: Case C-164/15 P Commission v Aer Lingus, T-812/14 BPC Lux and others v Commission, C-518/13 Eventech, T-500/12 Ryanair v Commission, T-473/12 Aer Lingus v Commission, T-251/11 Austria v Commission, T-362/10 Vtesse v Commission, C-279/08 P Commission v Netherlands, T-289/03 BUPA v Commission.
Important domestic cases include: R (Eventech) v Parking Adjudicator (High Court and CA), British Aggregates Association v HM Treasury (High Court and CA), R v SS for Trade and Industry, ex p BT3G and One2One (High Court and CA), Professional Contractors Group (High Court and CA).
Pharmaceutical regulation forms an increasingly important area of Kelyn’s domestic and European Court practice, and she is now regarded as one of the foremost practitioners in this field. She acts for both branded and generic companies, and her clients have included Pfizer, Merck, Teva, Generics UK, AstraZeneca, CTRS and Shire as well as the MHRA.
Important European Court cases include: Case C-567/16 Merck, C-138/15 P Teva v EMA, C-629/15 P Novartis v Commission, C-471/14 Seattle Genetics, T-452/14 CTRS v Commission (CTRS III), T-583/13 Shire v Commission, C-617/12 AstraZeneca, T-472/12 Novartis v Commission, T-301/12 CTRS v Commission (CTRS II), T-140/12 Teva v EMA, T-12/12 CTRS v Commission (CTRS I), C-427/09 Generics, C-527/07 Generics.
Important domestic cases include: Accord v Astellas (High Court), Chemistree and Blackbay v MHRA (High Court), Dr Reddy’s v Pfizer (High Court), Generics v Synaptech (High Court and CA).
General EU law
Kelyn has appeared in a number of high profile cases in the English and European Courts raising issues of general EU law, including in particular free movement rights and taxation.
Important European Court cases include: Case C-560/13 Wagner-Raith, C-362/12 FII No. 3, C-322/11 K, C-123/11 A Oy, C-35/11 FII No. 2, C-18/11 Philips Electronics, C-371/10 National Grid Indus, C-310/09 Accor, C-297/08 Commission v Italy, C-283/05 ASML, C-336/03 easyCar v OFT.
Important domestic cases include: Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation (High Court, CA and Supreme Court), Vodafone 2 v Revenue (High Court and CA), Boake Allen v Revenue (High Court, CA and House of Lords), DMG v Revenue (House of Lords), Pirelli v Revenue (House of Lords).
Kelyn has acted for both applicants and respondents in judicial review and other proceedings raising issues of domestic and EU law, including pharmaceutical regulation, telecommunications regulation, aviation regulation, consumer protection and human rights. She has represented private sector clients and government bodies, and has appeared in proceedings in the domestic courts as well as regulatory appeals in the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
Important cases include: Chemistree and Blackbay v MHRA (High Court), Addison Lee v TfL (High Court, CA and ECJ), BT et al v Ofcom (CA), Heathrow airport charges (CAA appeal), R (Bonhoeffer) v GMC, R (Zagorski and Baze) v SS for BIS (High Court), Vodafone v Ofcom (CAT), H3G and BT v Ofcom (CAT), OFT v Officers Club (High Court).
European Union Law of State Aid (2013, 2017)
Chapter in Navigating European Pharmaceutical Law, eds Manley and Vickers (2015)
European Community Law of State Aid (2009)
Section on State Aids in Encyclopaedia of EU Law, eds Vaughan and Robertson (2007 and 2011)
Chapter on ‘State Aids in the English Courts – Definition and Other Problems’ in The Law of State Aid in the European Union, eds Biondi, Eeckhout and Flynn (2004)
Chapters on licensing of IP rights under EC/UK competition law in Working with Technology: Law and Practice, eds Pierce and Purvis (2001)
‘Tying after Microsoft: One step forward and Two steps back?’ (2008) Competition Policy International 65
‘European Court of Justice upholds Judgment of the Court of First Instance in the British Airways/Virgin saga’ (2007) 2 Competition Policy International 227
‘The concept of state aid – The developing jurisprudence in the European and UK courts’ (2003) 24 European Competition Law Review 54
‘The substantive test for prohibition of a merger: did GE/Honeywell pass the test?’ (2002) 17 Eurolawyer 12
‘Differential Taxes, State Aids and the Lunn Poly Case’ (1999) 20 European Competition Law Review 384
‘State Aids and General Measures’ (1997) 17 Yearbook of European Law 269
‘State Regulation of the Market and EC Competition Rules: Articles 85 and 86 Compared’  European Competition Law Review 283
2015 - Elected as a Governing Bencher of the Inner Temple
1998 – present: Pupillage and practice at Brick Court Chambers, London
1997 – 1998: Inns of Court School of Law, London, Bar Vocational Course (Princess Royal Scholar, Inner Temple)
1996 – 1997: European University Institute, Florence, LLM in European Law
1994 – 1995: University of Konstanz, Germany, Erasmus student
1992 – 1996: Merton College, Oxford, MA in Law with law studies in Europe (1st class)
"Kelyn Bacon QC is considered “the top young competition silk at the Bar”. In praising her, sources remark that she is “incredibly smart and tough”. She has been involved in numerous landmark UK and EU competition cases, with a particular specialism in state aid law." (Who's Who Legal - UK Bar: Competition 2017)
"She's got a terrific brain and is good under siege." (Chambers & Partners 2017)
"She is sensible, gives pragmatic advice and is very accessible." "She is exceptionally well regarded and seen as a really serious opponent." (Chambers & Partners 2017)
"Kelyn is great as she's efficient, bright and helpful." (Chambers & Partners 2017)
"She is a clear and forceful drafter, and has a very sharp conceptual intellect." (Chambers & Partners 2017)
"Insightful and authoritative; an outstanding barrister." (Legal 500 2016)
"She gives excellent, commercial and pragmatic advice and is a veritable encyclopaedia on all matters competition-related." (Chambers & Partners 2016)
"Very sharp, highly intelligent and very quick to turn work around." (Chambers & Partners 2016)
"Excellent, extremely knowledgeable, responsive and someone who always offers practical advice." (Chambers & Partners 2016)
“New silk Kelyn Bacon QC is ‘bound to make an easy transition’ thanks to her ‘outstanding’ knowledge and experience in competition law. She has particular expertise in state aid law and pharmaceutical regulation.” (Who’s Who Legal UK Bar 2015)
“Kelyn Bacon QC has a ‘fierce intellect’ and is noted for her ‘compelling arguments’.” (Who's Who Legal UK Bar 2015)
“She is highly intelligent and grasps the key points quickly, while her advice is pragmatic and often takes account of the bigger picture.” (Chambers & Partners 2015)
“A devastatingly effective advocate” (Chambers & Partners 2015)
“Very quick, very thorough and very responsive.” (Chambers & Partners 2015)
“She impresses with the dexterity and speed with which she gets on top of things.” (Chambers & Partners 2015)
“Incredibly bright and hardworking.” (The Legal 500 2014)
“She is very quick at legal analysis, good at drafting, and an excellent advocate.” (Chambers & Partners 2014)
“Clients value her knowledge of the workings of regulatory bodies, such as the OFT, whom she often represents as lead counsel. She is also valued for her knowledge of state aid.” (Chambers & Partners 2014)
“Phenomenally bright, she is responsive and focused on getting the right answer.” (Chambers & Partners 2014)
“An obvious person to turn to for state aid matters. She also demonstrates first-rate talent on matters concerning EU IP law and on cases pertaining to the pharmaceutical industry.” (Chambers & Partners 2014)
“She has a fantastic intellect and that ability to see through to core issues and present them in a compelling and simple way. She's commercial, sharp and pragmatic.” (Chambers & Partners 2014)
French, German, conversational Italian.