“One of the calmest and technically most able lawyers, who is a pleasure to work with." "Excellent – she's hard-working and efficient."
- Chambers & Partners 2015
"She's fantastic at case preparation and has a wonderful understanding of litigation." "She has a really detailed knowledge of the law."
- Chambers & Partners 2015
Sarah Ford is an able and versatile junior with significant experience in EU, competition and public law and commercial litigation. She has advised on and appeared in a wide range of matters before the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, Competition Appeal Tribunal, Competition Commission and the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Sarah is recommended as a leading junior in the Chambers & Partners and the Legal 500 directories, where she is described as drawing on "significant experience in both public law and commercial litigation when advising on a diverse range of matters" (Chambers & Partners 2013), providing "concise and considered" advice (Legal 500 2012), having "in-depth knowledge and great experience" (Chambers & Partners 2012) and "thorough drafting and fine advocacy skills that would put someone years her senior to shame" (Chambers & Partners 2011). Sarah is also ranked in Competition Law in Chambers Global 2015.
Sarah was awarded 'Competition/EU Junior of the Year' at the Chambers Bar Awards 2014. In November 2011 Sarah was identified as one of Legal Week's ‘Stars at the Bar' 2011 and featured in an article entitled "Bright Lights" which profiled "10 promising junior barristers singled out as some of the best in the profession". She was described as "intelligent, industrious and insightful" with "an affable style and level-headed approach in the most stressful situations, making her a talented asset to any team."
Sarah was appointed to the Treasury C Panel in 2007 and the B Panel in 2012.
- National Grid Electricity Transmission plc v Gas Insulated Switchgear cartelists (Chancery Division): Junior Counsel for ABB Ltd, instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, in a high value follow-on damages claim nominated for Litigation of the Year by by Global Competition Review.
- BCL Old Co Ltd v BASF SE (formerly BASF AG)  UKSC 45;  1 W.L.R. 2922;  Bus. L.R. 1801;  1 All E.R. 457 (Supreme Court): Junior Counsel for BASF, instructed by Mayer Brown International LLP, in the first case on the Competition Act 1998 to reach the Supreme Court.
- British Sky Broadcasting & Ors v Office of Communications  CAT 20: Junior Counsel for British Telecommunications plc in this long running, high profile litigation involving Ofcom, Sky, the FA Premier League, BT and Virgin Media.
- Electrical and Waste Recycling Group v Philips Electronics Ltd & Ors (Chancery Division): Junior Counsel for the Defendants, instructed by Eversheds LLP, in a high value claim for breaches of the Chapter I and Chapter II Prohibitions of the Competition Act 1998 in the waste lightbulb recycling industry.
- Purple Parking Limited v Heathrow Airport Limited  EWHC 987 (Ch);  U.K.C.L.R. 492: Junior Counsel for Heathrow, instructed by Herbert Smith LLP, in a claim for abuse of a dominant position.
- Mehboob Travel Ltd v Pakistan International Airlnes Corp (Commercial Court): Junior Counsel for Pakistan International Airlines Corporation, instructed by Clyde & Co LLP, successfully resisting an application for interim relief based on alleged abuse of a dominant position.
- Bid Rigging in the Construction Industry: Junior Counsel for the OFT in various appeals before the CAT against fines imposed in the OFT's Decision on Bid Rigging in the Construction Industry.
- Secretary of State for Health & Ors v Norton Healthcare Limited & Ors (Chancery Division): Junior Counsel for Goldshield Group plc, instructed by Jones Day, resisting claims for damages on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health for alleged price fixing in the sale of the generic drug warfarin. This matter was also the subject of parallel criminal proceedings in which the Serious Fraud Office sought to prosecute the Defendants for conspiracy to defraud.
- Interventions on behalf of the United Kingdom in preliminary references in Cases C-12/12 Collosseum AG; C-128/08 Damseaux; Case C-384/09 Prunus.
- Cases C-390/07 Commission v UK and C-301/10 Commission v UK: Junior Counsel for the United Kingdom in infraction proceedings arising from the Waste Water Treatment Directive.
- Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v Revenue and Customs Commissioners  UKSC 19;  2 A.C. 337;  2 W.L.R. 1149;  Bus. L.R. 1033;  3 All E.R. 909;  S.T.C. 1362;  B.T.C. 312;  S.T.I. 1707 (Supreme Court): Junior Counsel for the Revenue in long running proceedings estimated to be worth £5 billion. This matter has so far been the subject of three references to the CJEU.
- Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer PLC (Supreme Court): Junior Counsel for the Revenue in litigation concerning corss-border loss relief and EU freedom of establishment.
- Vodafone 2 v Revenue & Customs Commissioners  EWCA Civ 446;  Ch. 77;  2 W.L.R. 288;  Bus. L.R. 96;  S.T.C. 1480;  Eu. L.R. 110;  B.T.C. 273;  S.T.I. 1795; Times, June 26, 2009 (Court of Appeal): Junior Counsel for the Revenue in a case concerning the duty of conforming interpretation.
- Wholesale calls: Junior Counsel for BT, instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, responding to Ofcom's statement of objections arising from a complaint by Thus Plc and Gamma Telecom Limited against BT about alleged margin squeeze in wholesale call pricing.
- Vodafone plc v British Telecommunications plc (Court of Appeal)  EWCA Civ 391;  3 All E.R. 1028;  Bus. L.R. 1666: Junior Counsel for BT in disputes arising from the imposition of price controls for mobile call termination.
- Cable & Wireless (Cayman Islands) Limited v Information and Communications Technology Authority (Cayman Islands Court of Appeal)
- Hutchison 3G (UK) Ltd v Office of Communications  CAT 39 (Competition Appeal Tribunal)
- British Telecommunications Plc v Director General of the Office of Telecommunications  CAT 8 (Competition Appeal Tribunal): first appeal to the Competition Appeal Tribunal under the Communications Act 2003.
- Unipart Group Limited v 02 (UK) Limited & Call Connections Limited  EWCA Civ 1034 (Court of Appeal).
- The Queen, on the application of H Lundbeck A/S and Lundbeck Ltd v. Licensing Authority ex parte Teva, Generics UK, Tiefenbacher, Winthrop, Ratiopharm & Arrow (Administrative Court): Junior Counsel for Lundbeck, instructed by Arnold & Porter LLP, in a judicial review of the decision of the Licensing Authority to grant marketing authorisations for generic versions of Lundbeck's product Cipralex (escitalopram).
- Case C-452/06 R (Synthon BV) v Licensing Authority & Smithkline Beecham plc  ECR;  EWHC 1759 (CJEU, Administrative Court and Chancery Division): Junior Counsel for Synthon, instructed by SJ Berwin LLP, in a claim for damages against the Licensing Authority for wrongful refusal of a marketing authorisation in respect of Synthon's product containing the active substance paroxetine.
Public and administrative law
- R (Ware) v Neath Port Talbot Council  EWHC 913 (Admin) (Administrative Court)
- Norris v Government of the United States of America, The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Bow Street Magistrates' Court  2 All ER 29 (Divisional Court)
- Department for the Environment, Food & Rural Affairs v Feakins & Hawkins  EWCA Civ 1513,  BPIR 895 (Court of Appeal)
- R (Scottish Power) v Ofgem & National Grid plc  EWHC 2324 (Admin) (Administrative Court)
- R (Takeley Parish Council) v Stansted Airport (Administrative Court)
- Standard Bank plc v Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber  EWHC 2866 (Comm): Junior Counsel on behalf of Sheikh Mohamed, instructed by King & Spalding International LLP, resisting a summary judgment application against the Sheikh as the guarantor under two facility agreements.
- Berghoff Trading Limited & Ors v Rosserlane Developments Ltd & Ors  EWCA Civ 413 (Court of Appeal) Nobes v Berghoff Trading Limited (Commercial Court): Junior Counsel for the Berghoff, instructed by McGuire Woods LLP, in a multi-million pound dispute in the Commercial Court and Court of Appeal concerning the sale of interests in an Azerbaijani oil field.
- LLB Law with European Law (2000) (First Class)
- LLM (Harvard Law School) (2001)
- Bar Vocational Course (2002)
- Junior Counsel to the Crown B Panel (2012)
- Junior Counsel to the Crown C Panel (2007)
- Called to Cayman Islands Bar (2007)
- Barrister, Brick Court Chambers (2003 to date)
- Pupillage: Brick Court Chambers (2002-2003)
- Called to the Bar: Lincoln's Inn (2002)
- Bar European Group
- Competition Law Association
- Cited as Leading Junior in Chambers and Partners in the area of EU and Competition 2007 - 2013
- Featured in Legal Week's Stars at the Bar 2011
- Languages: French and German
- Contributor to Competition Litigation, UK Practice and Procedure, Mark Brealey QC, Nicholas Green QC, (2010)
- Contributor to Civil Appeals, edited by Sir Michael Burton, Sweet & Maxwell (forthcoming)
- ‘The increased aggression of the EC Commission in extraterritorial enforcement of the merger regulation and its impact on transatlantic cooperation in antitrust' 29
- Syracuse J. Int'l. L. & Com. 263 (2002)
- “One of the calmest and technically most able lawyers, who is a pleasure to work with." "Excellent – she's hard-working and efficient." (Chambers & Partners 2015)
- “Peers particularly applaud her for her work on behalf of BT. She has a strong and varied client base though and has handled numerous judicial review, EU and competition law cases.” (Chambers & Partners 2015)
- "She's fantastic at case preparation and has a wonderful understanding of litigation." "She has a really detailed knowledge of the law." (Chambers & Partners 2015)
- "Tenacious and clear in her advocacy." (The Legal 500 2014)
- "She produces succinct and powerful pleadings and analysis - her perspective is always worth considering." (Chambers & Partners 2014)
- "She is very practical and good at interacting with clients." (Chambers & Partners 2014)
- "Sarah Ford draws on significant experience in both public law and commercial litigation when advising on a diverse range of matters. She has a "very good understanding of the nuances of what goes on in the court and the subtle undertones of what is really being said," and is praised by counsel and solicitors alike. The last year has seen her act as junior counsel for the defendants in damages claims resulting from an alleged abuse of dominance in the waste light bulb collection market." (Chambers & Partners 2013)
- "Sarah Ford's advice is ‘concise and considered'." (Legal 500 2012)
- "Fellow junior Sarah Ford matches Demetriou with her "in-depth knowledge and great experience." She has been acting as junior counsel alongside Mark Brealey QC for the defendant Heathrow Airport in a dispute concerning the alleged abuse of a dominant position. This case derived from a ban on the conduct of valet parking activities at Heathrow Airport forecourts." (Chambers & Partners 2012)
- "Sarah Ford, who has been attracting increasing market attention for her "thorough drafting and fine advocacy skills that would put someone years her senior to shame." Recent work highlights for her include acting for BT in its appeal against Ofcom-stipulated call termination charges." (Chambers & Partners 2011)
- "...up-and-comer Sarah Ford ... continues to impress with her ‘quick thinking, thoroughness and preparation.' "
- "Sarah Ford is a youthful and "very bright" barrister who wins praise for her technical abilities and strong work ethic." (2008)
- "...up-and-comer Sarah [Ford] was recommended as someone to keep an eye on in the competition arena, though she was also given credit for her wider European work." (2007)